Consumer Driven Health Plans Can Lower Your Overall Healthcare Costs

Over the past few years, increasingly more employers are turning to a consumer driven health plan (CDHP) to combat the rising cost of health care. CDHPs have become increasingly popular, surpassing HMOs to become the second most popular plan design (behind PPOs). A 2010 Mercer National Survey of employer-sponsored health plans found that 15% of small employers offered CDHPs in 2009, up from 9% in 2008. The increase is a direct result of smaller employers using the cost savings inherent in CDHPs to reduce their overall healthcare costs. The Mercer National Survey also found that 46% of all employers expect to offer CDHPs over the next five years.How CDHPs Function
The CDHP model is designed to encourage employees to make more informed and cost efficient decisions regarding their health care and to let the individual decide how their healthcare dollars are spent. Consumer driven health plans work by combining a high deductible health insurance plan with a tax advantaged spending account (typically a Health Reimbursement Arrangement or Health Savings Account) to help pay for the high deductible of the health plan. An HRA or HSA allows the employee to leverage tax-free dollars for the use of their health care. CDHPs help to promote healthy living and wellness, and also reveal the true cost of healthcare to consumers who have long been insulated from the actual costs.One of the results of CDHPs is lower premium costs which employers can take the savings from and apply to an HRA or HSA plan for employees to cover the cost of higher deductibles. Some employers have experience cost savings of up to 25% to 30% by switching to CDHPs. HRA and HSA accounts help to keep employer costs predictable in the long run by maintaining benefit levels as long as employers take the savings and set them aside to stabilize unknown future costs.Making CDHPs Work
CDHPs require a culture change to be truly effective. Employees need to take an active role in finding the location where they get the best and most service for their healthcare dollars. In an article written by Bruce Shutan for the United Benefit Advisors, Gerald L. Staten, senior vice president for Leonard Insurance Services argues that “people with auto insurance don’t expect that their annual deductible will cover oil changes, so why should it be any different with health insurance?” Staten argues that employees must be willing to pay for small amounts of healthcare costs out of pocket for office visits and prescription drugs.Many clever consumers with CDHPs have noticed and taken advantage of the disparity in the pricing of healthcare services. For example, when one man needed to get a CAT scan but didn’t want to pay his annual deductible of $6000, he shopped around to check the prices of the procedure at different offices. He received three quotes ($750, $1050 and $1950) for the procedure and was able to bargain down the first quote to $500. If employees can effectively handle the money contributed by their employer, they may not have to spend any of their own.If you would like to hear more about our HSA or HRA administration, call 1-800-444-1922 ext. 3.
You may also request a proposal by clicking here.

Visit www.fairgo.casino to find out more regarding fairgo casino

Identity Management – The New Frontier in Healthcare

Remember party lines? Telephones, at one time, were connected to multiple parties. One could pick up the handset to find out that the neighbor down the street was already tying up the line. Believe it or not, party lines and the lessons one learned about keeping secrets from others “on the line” are instructive today. Only today, the shared access is often access to data. As data bases grow in detail and points of access, there is a growing need to identify — and control — who has access to what information based on their role and rights. This identification, to be effective, also calls for methods to authenticate and authorize users of the system. In short, who is “on the line” and should they be there.
 
While many businesses have been grappling with the need to identify and grant access to information, healthcare has largely ignored these issues until confronted with them through government or regulatory authority. As a result, healthcare — as an industry — has yet to fully engage in the new frontier of identity management.
 
But, the need for identity management in healthcare is real, since identification errors can have tragic consequences. A misfiled document or an error in names can lead to deadly consequences. Consider the following:

The LA Times reports that 150 people have access to at least part of a patient’s records during a hospitalization, opening the door for misfiled or lost data.

Insurance cards — either for private or government benefits programs — are easily passed from one person to another.

Hospital staff members have gained access to and revealed medical files of a celebrity.

“Nancy Smith” is given medication intended for another Nancy Smith.

Identity management’s goal is to uniquely identify an individual. It becomes most important when one is identifying an individual within a system as a means to control their access to resources or establishing their rights or limitations within their system.
 
As healthcare providers reach outside of their own networks, the need to identify and authenticate individuals and assign roles and responsibilities becomes even more important. As systems become interoperable, the need for secure and private access to data, coupled with certainty of identity of users and their roles will take center stage.
 
One of the more ubiquitous — and frustrating — examples of identity management is the password. While dealing with multiple passwords is frustrating for individuals, the cost of administering and resetting passwords to business, including healthcare, is huge. A Siemens study found that a typical password related call averages $25, costing an enterprise of 2,000 as much as $152,620 per year. Identity management tools that reduce or eliminate reliance on passwords include single-sign on applications, smart cards and systems using biometric identification and readers.
 
Insurance plans have long used knowledge-based information as a means to identify beneficiaries. Not only must someone present an insurance benefit card, they must also provide a social security number or some other “fact” to verify eligibility. This reliance on personal data can be thwarted by either voluntarily sharing this data with someone else who uses it to obtain services and benefit or by identity thieves who sell this information so someone else can fraudulently obtain services. By tying in positive and robust identification, especially biometric identification, for each person requesting and receiving benefits, sharing or theft of services is ended.
 
The growth of data bases — and the ability to easily access data from multiple sites or via the Internet —  has made breaches of data a problem for healthcare providers. When information is breached, such as a celebrity’s medical records, the challenge is often identifying who leaked the data. By positively identifying each and every person with access to data, identifying the leak is more readily accomplished. Data must be linked to identity rather than passwords, since passwords are easily divined or readily available as a “sticky note” on the monitor or a password list in the desk drawer.
 
Positive identification of a person can also reduce medical errors by ensuring that each and every “Nancy Smith” is uniquely identified. This ends the medication errors or misfiling of information that can occur when a hospital file is “touched” by as many as 150 people.
 
The new frontier of identity management must be crossed to restore trust to the healthcare system. Through robust credentialing of individuals — and the ability to share the results of that credentialing and authentication of the person and their rights and responsibilities — the healthcare industry will make dramatic leaps in quality of care and increase efficiency.
 
©Secure Services Corp. 2009